| Date |
| PLAY |
Dawkins wants my children- but will he pay for their education? |
December 11, 2012 |
| truth4homer@gmail.com
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
Disputatio
Justifying Non-Christian Objections
Douglas Wilson & Farrell Till
Whenever we object to something, we always assume some standard or rule that the thing violates. Similarly, when non-Christians object to the Christian faith, they assume some standard that Christianity violates. But can non-Christians justify these standards that they so readily use? In the following interchange, the editor of Credenda/Agenda, Douglas Wilson and Farrell Till, editor of The Skeptical Review , discuss the topic of justifying non-Christian standards of ethics and reason.
For the past thirty years, Farrell Till has been an English instructor at Spoon River College in Canton, Illinois. Prior to this, he was a preacher and foreign missionary for the Church of Christ. He attended two Bible colleges and received his bachelor's and master's degrees from Harding University. His preaching career spanned twelve years, five of which were spent in missionary work in France. After becoming an agnostic, he quit the ministry in 1963 and began a teaching career. For the past five years, he has edited The Skeptical Review , a quarterly journal that focuses on the doctrine of biblical inerrancy. He has regularly debated inerrancy-related issues in various public forums, including radio and television. Having begun this work as an agnostic, he now considers himself an atheist.
DW: Many unbelievers commonly object to the God of the Bible on the basis of ethical "problems" with the character of God as revealed in the Scriptures. Whether they use psalms of imprecation, the slaughter of the Canaanites, the eternal wrath of God on the impenitent, etc ., the central theme is usually the same "Who would want to worship a God like that !" But despite the surface plausibility of the objection, a careful examination of it shows their Achilles attacking our Hector with his bare heel. Far from being the unbeliever's strongest case against the true God, this objection actually reveals the radical futility of unbelief; without God there are no ethical objections to anything .
FT: Although you didn't expressly state the "objective-morality" position of evangelical apologists, you certainly implied it when you said that "without God there are no ethical objections to anything." The fallacy of this position is its failure to recognize that morality is an intellectual abstraction. As such, it is no different from abstractions of tragedy, sorrow, or any of many other abstractions the human mind has formulated from its broad range of experience. Arguing that human intelligence cannot determine if acts are immoral without a god to tell us they are is as illogical as arguing that we cannot tell if events are tragic without a god of tragedy to tell us they are.
DW: Fine, I'll bite. If there is no God, then all the things you mention are in the same meaningless category. Morality, tragedy, and sorrow are equally evanescent. They are all empty sensations created by the chemical reactions of the brain, in turn created by too much pizza the night before. If there is no God, then all abstractions are chemical epiphenomena, like swamp gas over fetid water. This means that we have no reason for assigning truth and falsity to the chemical fizz we call reasoning or right and wrong to the irrational reaction we call morality. If no God, mankind is a set of bi-pedal carbon units of mostly water. And nothing else.
FT: You bit too hard. In equating all human abstractions with "swamp gas over fetid water," you overlook verifiable facts. The human mind can think; swamp gas can't. Human intelligence can evaluate situations and formulate abstractions of beauty, happiness, sorrow, fairness and morality; swamp gas can't. Are these abstractions valid? Well, what IQ level is needed to conceptualize abstractions like beautiful, sad, fair, right or wrong? Can one with an IQ of 100 do it, or must his IQ be infinite? The existence of moral |
|
| PLAY |
Was the Reason Rally Reasonable? |
May 1, 2012 |
| An examination of the assertions made by Richard Dawkins at the recent Reason Rally in Washington D.C. Turns out it was really a "Bash Christianity Rally". Closing with ApologetiX as usual.
truth4homer@gmail.com
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com/2012/04/what-think-ye-of-logic.html
Fallacies of Relevance:
Ad Hominem
Ad Hominem Circumstantial
Ad Populum (appeal to the masses)
Appeal to Tradition (appeal to the past)
Ad Verecundiam (appeal to authority)
Ad Baculum (appeal to force) Ad Misericordiam (appeal to pity)
Ad Ignorantiam (appeal to ignorance) Tu Quo ("You're one, too!")
Fallacies of Presumption:
Fallacy of Accident
Hasty Generalization
Biased Statistics
Bifurcation (False dilemma)
Complex Question
Post Hoc, ergo Propter Hoc ("after this, therefore because of this")
Red Herring
Slippery Slope
Additional Fallacies:
Affirming the Consequent
Denying the Antecedent
Questionable Analogy
Invincible Ignorance
Equivocation
Suppressed Evidence
Begging the Question
Fallacy of Division
Fallacy of Composition
Reductio Ad Adsurdum
Straw Man
1677/89 Confession: CHAP. II.
Of God and of the Holy Trinity.
2. God having all 38 life, 39 glory, 40goodness, blessedness, in and of himself: is alone in, and unto himself all-sufficient, not 41standing in need of any Creature which he hath made, nor deriving any glory from them, but only manifesting his own glory in, by, unto, and upon them, he is the alone fountain of all Being, 42 of whom, through whom, and to whom are all things, and he hath most sovereign 43dominion over all creatures, to do by them, for them, or upon them, whatsoever himself please; in his sight 44 all things are open and manifest, his knowledge is 45infinite, infallible, and independent upon the Creature, so as nothing is to him contingent, or uncertain; he is most
25 Joh. 4.24.
26 1 Tim. 1.17. Deut. 4.15,16.
27 Mal. 3.6.
28 1 King. 8.27. Jer. 23.23.
29 Ps. 90.2.
30 Gen. 17.1.
31 Isa. 6.3.
32 Ps. 115.3. Isa. 46.10.
33 Pro. 16.4. Rom. 11.36.
34 Exod. 34.6,7. Hebr. 11.6.
35 Neh. 9.32,33.
36 Ps. 5.5,6.
37 Exod. 34.7. Nahum. 1,2,3.
38 Joh. 5.26.
39 Ps. 148.13.
40 Ps. 119.68.
41 Job, 22.2,3.
42 Rom. 11.34.35,36.
43 Dan. 4.25. and v. 34, 35.
44 Heb. 4.13.
45 Ezek. 11.5Act. 15.18.
I'd love to hear from you. Email me an mp3 and I'll put it on the next podcast (whenever that might be). |
|
| PLAY |
Is There Evidence for Evidential Apologetics? |
November 16, 2011 |
| An examination of Evidential Apologetics.
Looking at an article by Louis D. Whitworth, the former senior editor at Probe Ministries. He is a graduate of Northeast Louisiana University (B.A., Sociology and English, and M.A., English) and Dallas Theological Seminary (Th.M., Pastoral Theology). Prior to joining Probe, Lou taught English literature and composition at the college level and served with Campus Crusade for Christ in the Military Ministry as well as the Singles Ministry. He is the author of the Probe booklet, Literature Under the Microscope: A Christian Look at Reading.
This guy sounds really smart, but he gets it all wrong!!
Romans 1:19ff For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools ... |
|
| PLAY |
A Brief Look at Open Theism |
September 4, 2011 |
| My wife and I discuss her recent encounter with an Open Theist.
A Reformed and confessional response...
1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith Chapter 3: Of God's Decree
1. God hath decreed in himself, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably, all things, whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby is God neither the author of sin nor hath fellowship with any therein; nor is violence offered to the will of the creature, nor yet is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established; in which appears his wisdom in disposing all things, and power and faithfulness in accomplishing his decree.
( Isaiah 46:10; Ephesians 1:11; Hebrews 6:17; Romans 9:15, 18; James 1:13; 1 John 1:5; Acts 4:27, 28; John 19:11; Numbers 23:19; Ephesians 1:3-5 )
2. Although God knoweth whatsoever may or can come to pass, upon all supposed conditions, yet hath he not decreed anything, because he foresaw it as future, or as that which would come to pass upon such conditions.
( Acts 15:18; Romans 9:11, 13, 16, 18 )
3. By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated, or foreordained to eternal life through Jesus Christ, to the praise of his glorious grace; others being left to act in their sin to their just condemnation, to the praise of his glorious justice.
( 1 Timothy 5:21; Matthew 25:34; Ephesians 1:5, 6; Romans 9:22, 23; Jude 4 )
4. These angels and men thus predestinated and foreordained, are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished.
( 2 Timothy 2:19; John 13:18 )
Concluding with music from ApologetiX (from their free podcast) |
|
| PLAY |
Charismatic Delusions |
June 27, 2011 |
| The confusions, delusions and unintelligible elocutions of former Homer resident John Crowder. This is what I have to deal with people! Plus some clips from ApologetiX.
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
truth4homer@gmail.com |
|
| PLAY |
Presuppositional Apologetics Part 3 |
May 4, 2011 |
| Finishing up an analysis of John Loftus' opening statements in the D'Souza debate. A Reformed confessional defense of basic Christian doctrines. Concluding with Bahnsen and the problem of evil. (Sorry, ran out of time abruptly, the apple rainbow wheel of rage popped up and told me my computer was about to freeze - working on a very old iMac.)
Email comments, questions or metaphysical concerns to:
truth4homer@gmail.com
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
Peace out dogs |
|
| PLAY |
Presuppositional Apologetics Part 2 |
April 6, 2011 |
| Continuing to review the debate between John Loftus and Dinesh D'Souza in the light of scripture. Concludes with The Dawkins Delusion LOL
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
truth4homer@gmail.com |
|
| PLAY |
Presuppositional Apologetics Part 1 |
March 21, 2011 |
| Examining the debate between former Pastor now apostate John Loftus and Evidential Christian Apologist Dinesh D'Souza in the light of Scripture.
truth4homer@gmail.com
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com |
|
| PLAY |
The 1689 Second London Confession Ch. 27-32 |
January 11, 2011 |
| CHAPTER 27 OF THE COMMUNION OF SAINTS
CHAPTER 28 OF BAPTISM AND THE LORD'S SUPPER
CHAPTER 29 OF BAPTISM
CHAPTER 30 OF THE LORD'S SUPPER
CHAPTER 31 OF THE STATE OF MAN AFTER DEATH, AND OF THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD
CHAPTER 32 OF THE LAST JUDGMENT |
|
| PLAY |
The 1689 Second London Confession Ch. 26 |
January 11, 2011 |
| Of the Church
1. The catholic or universal church, which (with respect to the internal work of the Spirit and truth of grace) may be called invisible, consists of the whole number of the elect, that have been, are, or shall be gathered into one, under Christ, the head thereof; and is the spouse, the body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
( Hebrews 12:23; Colossians 1:18; Ephesians 1:10, 22, 23; Ephesians 5:23, 27, 32 )
2. All persons throughout the world, professing the faith of the gospel, and obedience unto God by Christ according unto it, not destroying their own profession by any errors everting the foundation, or unholiness of conversation, are and may be called visible saints; and of such ought all particular congregations to be constituted.
( 1 Corinthians 1:2; Acts 11:26; Romans 1:7; Ephesians 1:20-22 )
3. The purest churches under heaven are subject to mixture and error; and some have so degenerated as to become no churches of Christ, but synagogues of Satan; nevertheless Christ always hath had, and ever shall have a kingdom in this world, to the end thereof, of such as believe in him, and make profession of his name.
( 1 Corinthians 5; Revelation 2; Revelation 3; Revelation 18:2; 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12; Matthew 16:18; Psalms 72:17; Psalm 102:28; Revelation 12:17 )
4. The Lord Jesus Christ is the Head of the church, in whom, by the appointment of the Father, all power for the calling, institution, order or government of the church, is invested in a supreme and sovereign manner; neither can the Pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof, but is that antichrist, that man of sin, and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the church against Christ, and all that is called God; whom the Lord shall destroy with the brightness of his coming.
( Colossians 1:18; Matthew 28:18-20; Ephesians 4:11, 12; 2 Thessalonians 2:2-9 )
5. In the execution of this power wherewith he is so intrusted, the Lord Jesus calleth out of the world unto himself, through the ministry of his word, by his Spirit, those that are given unto him by his Father, that they may walk before him in all the ways of obedience, which he prescribeth to them in his word. Those thus called, he commandeth to walk together in particular societies, or churches, for their mutual edification, and the due performance of that public worship, which he requireth of them in the world.
( John 10:16; John 12:32; Matthew 28:20; Matthew 18:15-20 )
6. The members of these churches are saints by calling, visibly manifesting and evidencing (in and by their profession and walking) their obedience unto that call of Christ; and do willingly consent to walk together, according to the appointment of Christ; giving up themselves to the Lord, and one to another, by the will of God, in professed subjection to the ordinances of the Gospel.
( Romans. 1:7; 1 Corinthians 1:2; Acts 2:41, 42; Acts 5:13, 14; 2 Corinthians 9:13 )
7. To each of these churches thus gathered, according to his mind declared in his word, he hath given all that power and authority, which is in any way needful for their carrying on that order in worship and discipline, which he hath instituted for them to observe; with commands and rules for the due and right exerting, and executing of that power.
( Matthew 18:17, 18; 1 Corinthians 5:4, 5; 1 Corinthians 5:13; 2 Corinthians 2:6-8 )
8. A particular church, gathered and completely organized according to the mind of Christ, consists of officers and members; and the officers appointed by Christ to be chosen and set apart by the church (so called and gathered), for the peculiar administration of ordinances, and execution of power or duty, which he intrusts them with, or calls them to, to be continued to the end of the world, are bishops or elders, and deacons.
( Acts 20:17, 28; Philippians 1:1 )
9. The way appointed by Christ for the calling of any person, fitted and gifted by the Holy Spirit, unto the office of bishop or elder in a church, is, that he be |
|
| PLAY |
The 1689 Second London Confession Ch. 20-25 |
January 11, 2011 |
| CHAPTER 20 OF THE GOSPEL, AND OF THE EXTENT OF THE GRACE THEREOF
CHAPTER 21 OF CHRISTIAN LIBERTY AND LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE
CHAPTER 22 OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP AND THE SABBATH DAY
CHAPTER 23 OF LAWFUL OATHS AND VOWS
CHAPTER 24 OF THE CIVIL MAGISTRATE
CHAPTER 25 OF MARRIAGE |
|
| PLAY |
The 1689 Second London Confession Ch. 16-19 |
January 11, 2011 |
| Chapter 16 of Good Works
Chapter 17 of Perseverance of the Saints
Chapter 18 of Assurance of Grace and Salvation
Chapter 19 of the Law of God |
|
| PLAY |
The 1689 Second London Confession Ch. 10-15 |
January 11, 2011 |
| Chapter 10 of Effectual Calling
Chapter 11 of Justification
Chapter 12 of Adoption
Chapter 13 of Sanctification
Chapter 14 of Saving Faith
Chapter 15 of Repentance unto life and Salvation |
|
| PLAY |
The 1689 Second London Confession Ch. 9 |
January 11, 2011 |
| Of Free Will
1. God hath endued the will of man with that natural liberty and power of acting upon choice, that it is neither forced, nor by any necessity of nature determined to do good or evil.
( Matthew 17:12; James 1:14; Deuteronomy 30:19 )
2. Man, in his state of innocency, had freedom and power to will and to do that which was good and well-pleasing to God, but yet was unstable, so that he might fall from it.
( Ecclesiastes 7:29; Genesis 3:6 )
3. Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able by his own strength to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto.
( Romans 5:6; Romans 8:7; Ephesians 2:1, 5; Titus 3:3-5; John 6:44 )
4. When God converts a sinner, and translates him into the state of grace, he freeth him from his natural bondage under sin, and by his grace alone enables him freely to will and to do that which is spiritually good; yet so as that by reason of his remaining corruptions, he doth not perfectly, nor only will, that which is good, but doth also will that which is evil.
( Colossians 1:13; John 8:36; Philippians 2:13; Romans 7:15, 18, 19, 21, 23 )
5. This will of man is made perfectly and immutably free to good alone in the state of glory only.
( Ephesians 4:13 ) |
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Baptist Confession Ch 7 |
December 27, 2010 |
|
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Baptist Confession Ch 8 |
December 27, 2010 |
|
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Baptist Confession Ch 6 |
December 27, 2010 |
|
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Confession Chapter 4 |
November 28, 2010 |
| Of Creation
1. In the beginning it pleased God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, for the manifestation of the glory of his eternal power, wisdom, and goodness, to create or make the world, and all things therein, whether visible or invisible, in the space of six days, and all very good.
( John 1:2, 3; Hebrews 1:2; Job 26:13; Romans 1:20; Colossians 1:16; Genesis 1:31 )
2. After God had made all other creatures, he created man, male and female, with reasonable and immortal souls, rendering them fit unto that life to God for which they were created; being made after the image of God, in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness; having the law of God written in their hearts, and power to fulfil it, and yet under a possibility of transgressing, being left to the liberty of their own will, which was subject to change.
( Genesis 1:27; Genesis 2:7; Ecclesiastes 7:29; Genesis 1:26; Romans 2:14, 15; Genesis 3:6 )
3. Besides the law written in their hearts, they received a command not to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which whilst they kept, they were happy in their communion with God, and had dominion over the creatures.
( Genesis 2:17; Genesis 1:26, 28 ) |
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Confession Chapter 5 |
November 28, 2010 |
| Of Divine Providence
1. God the good Creator of all things, in his infinite power and wisdom doth uphold, direct, dispose, and govern all creatures and things, from the greatest even to the least, by his most wise and holy providence, to the end for the which they were created, according unto his infallible foreknowledge, and the free and immutable counsel of his own will; to the praise of the glory of his wisdom, power, justice, infinite goodness, and mercy.( Hebrews 1:3; Job 38:11; Isaiah 46:10, 11; Psalms 135:6; Matthew 10:29-31; Ephesians 1:11 )
2. Although in relation to the foreknowledge and decree of God, the first cause, all things come to pass immutably and infallibly; so that there is not anything befalls any by chance, or without his providence; yet by the same providence he ordereth them to fall out according to the nature of second causes, either necessarily, freely, or contingently.
( Acts 2:23; Proverbs 16:33; Genesis 8:22 )
3. God, in his ordinary providence maketh use of means, yet is free to work without, above, and against them at his pleasure.
( Acts 27:31, 44; Isaiah 55:10, 11; Hosea 1:7; Romans 4:19-21; Daniel 3:27 )
4. The almighty power, unsearchable wisdom, and infinite goodness of God, so far manifest themselves in his providence, that his determinate counsel extendeth itself even to the first fall, and all other sinful actions both of angels and men; and that not by a bare permission, which also he most wisely and powerfully boundeth, and otherwise ordereth and governeth, in a manifold dispensation to his most holy ends; yet so, as the sinfulness of their acts proceedeth only from the creatures, and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither is nor can be the author or approver of sin.
( Romans 11:32-34; 2 Samuel 24:1, 1 Chronicles 21:1; 2 Kings 19:28; Psalms 76;10; Genesis 1:20; Isaiah 10:6, 7, 12; Psalms 1:21; 1 John 2:16 )
5. The most wise, righteous, and gracious God doth oftentimes leave for a season his own children to manifold temptations and the corruptions of their own hearts, to chastise them for their former sins, or to discover unto them the hidden strength of corruption and deceitfulness of their hearts, that they may be humbled; and to raise them to a more close and constant dependence for their support upon himself; and to make them more watchful against all future occasions of sin, and for other just and holy ends. So that whatsoever befalls any of his elect is by his appointment, for his glory, and their good.
( 2 Chronicles 32:25, 26, 31; 2 Corinthians 12:7-9; Romans 8:28 )
6. As for those wicked and ungodly men whom God, as the righteous judge, for former sin doth blind and harden; from them he not only withholdeth his grace, whereby they might have been enlightened in their understanding, and wrought upon their hearts; but sometimes also withdraweth the gifts which they had, and exposeth them to such objects as their corruption makes occasion of sin; and withal, gives them over to their own lusts, the temptations of the world, and the power of Satan, whereby it comes to pass that they harden themselves, under those means which God useth for the softening of others.( Romans 1:24-26, 28; Romans 11:7, 8; Deuteronomy 29:4; Matthew 13:12; Deuteronomy 2:30; 2 Kings 8:12, 13; Psalms 81:11, 12; 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12; Exodus 8:15, 32; Isaiah 6:9, 10; 1 Peter 2:7, 8 )
7. As the providence of God doth in general reach to all creatures, so after a more special manner it taketh care of his church, and disposeth of all things to the good thereof. ( 1 Timothy 4:10; Amos 9:8, 9; Isaiah 43:3-5 ) |
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Confession Ch. 3 |
October 7, 2010 |
| The most accurate articulation of Biblical Christianity. http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
truth4homer@gmail.com |
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Confession Ch. 2 |
October 7, 2010 |
| The most accurate articulation of Biblical Christianity. http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com |
|
| PLAY |
1689 Second London Confession Ch. 1 |
October 7, 2010 |
| The most accurate articulation of Biblical Christianity. truth4homer@gmail.com |
|
| PLAY |
Responding to an Anti-Calvinist rant |
September 21, 2010 |
| What does the Bible teach about predestination? Find out in this episode. Also please read Ephesians 1 & Romans 9.
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
truth4homer@gmail.com |
|
| PLAY |
Keach's Catechism QA 61-118 |
September 20, 2010 |
| A valuable resource for basic training in genuine biblical Christianity ...and a possible cure for insomnia ;-) How would you answer the question: "What is justification?" or "How do we know the Bible to be the word of God?" Find the answers in this edition of Truth Talk! Further reading at http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
truth4homer@gmail.com |
|
| PLAY |
Keach's Catechism QA 1-60 |
September 20, 2010 |
| A valuable resource for basic training in genuine biblical Christianity ...and a possible cure for insomnia ;-) How would you answer the question: "What is justification?" or "How do we know the Bible to be the word of God?" Find the answers in this edition of Truth Talk!
Further reading at http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com |
|
| PLAY |
Illustrating Logical Fallacies |
August 11, 2010 |
| Illustrating Logical Fallacies and an example of fallacious argument. Should we burn Q'rans?
Plugging better podcasts and blogs than mine
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com |
|
| PLAY |
Tongues and Prophecy today? |
June 13, 2010 |
| Concluding comments on continuationism, A "language instructor" on How to Speak in Tongues, Todd Bentley, Why I believe cessationsim is correct. What do you believe?
truth4homer@gmail.com
http://truthforhomer.blogspot.com
http://puritan.podomatic.com |
|
| PLAY |
truthtalk1.aif |
May 19, 2010 |
|
|
